Why every circuit should alternate

Written by Alex Norton - 2 Comments

It's common knowledge that should France return to the calendar for the first time since Magny-Cours last held a race in 2007, it will likely be at the expense of Belgium's legendary Spa-Francorchamps circuit - at least on a bi-annual basis. The prospect has divided opinion amongst Formula 1 fans: some justifiably want the birthplace of motorsport to play host to a grand prix, whilst others strongly dislike the idea of sacrificing a historic and much-loved location.

But why are we afraid of a spot of year-on-year variety? Let's face it, everything changes in Formula One. Drivers come and go, and the turnover of teams isn't all that far behind. Nobody stays still - bosses, designers, sponsors, managers, mechanics, engine suppliers and tyre manufacturers are all prone to either jumping ship every now and again or heading directly for the exit. This frantic pace of change means that no single season is the same, and every year new combinations go up against one another in the heat of battle. The only thing that remains fairly constant is the battlefield.

 Singapore

This year, seventeen of the locations we visit will have hosted the same race last year. But as Bernie Ecclestone never fails to inform sweating promoters, there's no shortage of countries that fancy a gig on the world's most exclusive tour. It's also reasonably obvious that twenty races per year is edging on unsustainable - with an off-season that has been chipped down to two months, there's certainly not much more room for expansion. So what's the solution? Mandatory race-sharing.

It might sound like madness, but surely there's an argument to be considered. If each race were guaranteed a slot every other year, then we would be opening Formula One up to forty different locations worldwide. Those familiar, popular old venues would secure their places for the foreseeable future, safe in the knowledge that Formula One would return every two years - whilst the sport explores new horizons that were previously knocking on a shut door. Think about it: in any given season we might visit Belgium, Hungary and China - and then the next we would be in France, Russia and Singapore. The next season we would revert, and so on.

When we actually arrived at a circuit, there would be no more mucking about. Having not turned a wheel at any given venue for twenty-four months, drivers would be queuing up at the pitlane exit to begin practice. Moreover, it would spice up the show. If your pilots, strategists and mechanics aren't quite so sure what to expect, you're going to get mixed up racing. The men in the cockpit are more likely to end up off the road, nobody's going to know when the tyres are going to go off and a paddock full of experimental set-ups could well turn the grid upside down. The outcome of a race is much more likely to be decided by inspired decision making than a honed repetition of last year's programme.

 Abu Dhabi

Of course, you would have to be careful to end up with a mixed calendar of traditional and not-so-traditional events - nobody wants a season in which Monaco, Suzuka and Spa are left on the sidelines whilst Yas Marina, Yeongam and Delhi welcome the world. What we want is a season where Silverstone sits alongside Sochi, followed by a year in which they are substituted by Sao Paulo and Singapore. That's what we all love about Formula 1 - its diversity. Each year we visit deserts, forests, cities and parks, and set twenty four of the world's best drivers loose. In any one year we must be sure to maintain that blend of history, novelty and complete contrast. And then a completely different year containing more of the same next year.

So there's my proposal. Formula 1 can only become a truly global sport when it visits every corner of the world and inspires people in the flesh with its colour, power and noise - and by visiting forty different venues over two years, it can truly achieve that. Those rustic old tracks will sit happily alongside their shiny modern counterparts, their places no longer under threat and those pesky hosting fees only coming up once every two years. As for the viewer, race weekends will feature more mistakes, courageous calls and underdog triumphs, the backdrop to which varies wildly every season. Come on Bernie, you know it makes sense.

Like this article? Then be social, share it with others...

About the Author

Alex has been a passionate F1 fan for as long as he can remember, catching the motorsport bug in the nineties after he was presented with his own kart. He met Felix in his school days and together they founded F1Lite which gained thousands of followers through Twitter and their website. Felix is now a member of the PortalF1 team too. Alex has journalistic ambitions, particularly in the field of sports and politics. However, in his spare time he prefers to relax by cycling, playing badminton, eating out and reading - a world away from the high octane thrills of motorsport.

2 Comments on "Why every circuit should alternate"

  1. erwin van meirvenne Saturday, March 31, 2012 14:16:53

    No Monaco, no Spa, no Silverstone? No Formula1 fan can wait two years to watch those races.

  2. alistairjh Tuesday, April 10, 2012 15:20:42

    I never thought of it like that. Maybe it would produce greater racing, but I still can't imagine a calendar without some of the historic races. Personally, the first full Formula One season I watched was in 2009, and when I look back on that, the absence of the Canadian Grand Prix is something I would not want to be repeated, even for a year. I like the idea of dividing the races equally between the continents, and seeing how that works out.

Leave a Comment

You must provide your name and email if you are not logged in. login